🔗 Share this article

Critics have accused the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, of adopting what they call “dangerous” discourse about migration, after he advocated for “extensive” removals of individuals from cities – and claimed that anyone with daughters would support his position.

Defiant Stance

The chancellor, who took office in May vowing to combat the rise of the right-wing AfD party, on Monday rebuked a correspondent who questioned whether he wished to retract his strict statements on migration from recently due to broad condemnation, or apologise for them.

“I am unsure if you have offspring, and female children among them,” Merz said to the journalist. “Consult your girls, I believe you’ll get a pretty loud and clear response. I have nothing to withdraw; on the contrary I emphasize: we have to modify the situation.”

Criticism from Rivals

Progressive critics charged the chancellor of borrowing tactics from radical groups, whose allegations that women and girls are being singled out by immigrants with assault has become a international right-wing mantra.

Ricarda Lang, charged that Merz of delivering a patronising comment for girls that overlooked their real societal issues.

“Maybe ‘the daughters’ are also fed up with Merz showing concern about their entitlements and protection when he can use them to support his totally backward-looking strategies?” she wrote on X.

Protection Priority

Merz stated his priority was “protection in public areas” and stressed that provided that it could be guaranteed “would the mainstream political parties win back faith”.

He received backlash last week for statements that critics said suggested that variety itself was a problem in Germany’s urban centers: “Naturally we still have this challenge in the urban landscape, and which is why the home affairs minister is now endeavoring to enable and conduct deportations on a extensive basis,” stated during a tour to the state of Brandenburg near Berlin.

Bias Accusations

Clemens Rostock charged the chancellor of stoking discriminatory attitudes with his statement, which drew limited demonstrations in several cities across Germany during the weekend.

“This is concerning when ruling parties try to characterize individuals as a issue according to their looks or origin,” Rostock said.

Natalie Pawlik of the SPD, government allies in the ruling coalition, said: “Migration should not be branded with reductive or popularist kneejerk reactions – this divides the public more deeply and eventually benefits the wrong people instead of promoting solutions.”

Party Dynamics

The chancellor’s CDU/CSU bloc recorded a underwhelming 28.5 percent performance in the national election in February versus the anti-foreigner, anti-Muslim AfD with its historic 20.8%.

Since then, the right-wing party has caught up with the conservative bloc, even overtaking it in certain surveys, in the context of voter fears around migration, crime and economic stagnation.

Background Information

Merz gained prominence of his political group promising a stricter approach on migration than former chancellor Angela Merkel, opposing her “wir schaffen das” motto from the asylum seeker situation a decade ago and assigning her some responsibility for the AfD’s strength.

He has promoted an sometimes heightened demagogic language than the former chancellor, famously blaming “little pashas” for repeated vandalism on December 31st and migrants for filling up oral health consultations at the detriment of German citizens.

Party Planning

Merz’s party met on the weekend to formulate a approach ahead of several local polls during the upcoming year. the far-right party has strong leads in several eastern states, flirting with a historic 40 percent backing.

The chancellor maintained that his organization was aligned in barring cooperation in administration with the AfD, a approach widely known as the “firewall”.

Internal Dissent

Nevertheless, the recent poll data has concerned some CDU members, leading a few of party officials and advisers to indicate in recently that the approach could be impractical and counterproductive in the future.

The critics maintain that provided that the 12-year-old AfD, which national intelligence agencies have designated as radical, is in a position to snipe from the sidelines without having to make the difficult decisions leadership demands, it will gain from the ruling party challenge affecting many western democracies.

Study Results

Academics in Germany have discovered that mainstream parties such as the CDU were increasingly allowing the extremist to set the agenda, unwittingly validating their proposals and disseminating them more widely.

Although Friedrich Merz avoided using the word “barrier” on the recent occasion, he maintained there were “fundamental differences” with the AfD which would make partnership impossible.

“We acknowledge this obstacle,” he declared. “Going forward also make it very clear and very explicit the AfD’s positions. We will distinguish ourselves explicitly and unequivocally from them. {Above all